Dangers of Molecular Nanotechnology (MNT) Prt 1
If potential benefits of molecular nanotechnology (MNT) sound too good to be true, there is one caveat — the potential dangers of molecular nanotechnology. When nanofactories can arrange atoms into structures — playing with the building blocks of life itself, or in this case nanoblocks — theoretically anything allowable by the laws of physics can be created fast and cheap. Requirements include a few square feet for the nanofactory, the software, and an electrical outlet. Criminals, terrorists, disturbed individuals, governments, and antisocial groups of all stripes would be incredibly empowered by such technology. Additional potential dangers of molecular nanotechnology threaten the economy, environment, human rights, and world peace. The rush to gain supremacy through nanoweaponry could lead to a new arms race, while attempts to stranglehold the technology would likely result in independent, covert development. Unilateral, “open-source” international cooperation is another option that runs its own risks, and control in the public sector could lead to inequitable benefits and an Orwellian society. The probability factor of certain potential dangers of molecular nanotechnology will be higher than others, but all are possible within a scope of circumstances that, without prevention through forethought and planning, could feasibly come to pass. Some dangers cannot be discounted even with said planning, while others can reasonably be assumed to be goals of recognized …
23 Responses 
Leave a Reply 
Start Living Longer
Free Subscription
Fountain of Youth
why the hell are the first second to ten or so videos on the DANGERS of molecular nanotech?? They should be on the BENEFITS of nanotech
Big Wars and Catastrophes are distractions for the real wars….Biological and nanotechnological…germ warfare.
Nanotech is the new NWO!
GO YUMANS!!!
Typical NWO propaganda. Wanting us to accept gene therapies to make us better and more useful drones under the new age.
This guy’s pretty deceptive…I’m assuming this is in front of a general audience, otherwise he’d have none
I’d feel a lot more comfortable with what he is saying if he were to talk about *morality* and not about “New Age spirituality”.
this guys an idiot!
A fully developed cell doesn’t need the genes to operate, true. It needs the genes so it can divide and make an exact copy of itself. Without the the genetic information we wouldn’t grow
So… if I get this right:
If brain is CD as to store information and you store a program to make interface to do some behavior, then it’s not the builder of CD who is controlling the interface OF COURSE.
BUT
It’s the CD that limits the size of program and the language in which to store it.
So… yeah, genes still reign supreme, sorry lad.
nut job
Just have a quick look of this, come back later.
google studies of twins separated at birth
or even better
identical strangers
Do you have a link to the studies of twins, where we can find the contradictions?
excellent work!
funny how studies of twins separated at birth counter everything this ‘man’ says.
funny how he says a belief switches on a gene AND genes are irrelevant. Did anyone else catch the LIE?
How old is this lecture? We’ve known for 10 years the it’s not one gene one protein. Post transcription editing is the basis of plurality of PROTEINS from identical code. This man should be locked up.
It’s also part of the cellular response system. Environmental factors can signal the nucleus to turn on or off production of proteins. In the case of turning on production the cell may not have needed to prior to being enucleated so the protein would never get produced the cell would lack that beneficial tool and in many cases cecum and fail due to the inability to respond.
This guy is so far off base it’s not even funny. Truly this man is a criminal.
This is FUCKING interesting.
ahh.. i did not catch that!.. yes– the cell would not be Able to reproduce…. since there are no chromosomes to give to the daughter cells!
i still think that besides that…it is pretty amazing .. to see the general behaviour of the cell unaffected after the Nucleus is removed. … since the DNA does control what happens inside the cell.. even if it is indirect…
that is so interesting! i did not Know.. that the cell is Unaffected after the ‘Control Centre’– the Nucleus is removed from the cell. omg– this goes against everything i have learnt! LOL waooow.
Good video
Sounds logical.
Earlyer theology has dispute of predestination similar to later DNA teachings..
God bless Ron Paul in efforts to make sound monetary system based on valuable metals.
This man is so wrong, I have spotted his error and i am not even a geneticist just an amateur. He said that when DNA is removed still behaves the same as before the removal.
Only one thing that he did not mention that would be affected cell reproduction because that is the function of the DNA to code for the reproduction of the cell not to directly control cell functions.
vitrohype